Drexel University Home Pagewww.drexel.edu DREXEL UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES HOMEPAGE >>
iDEA DREXEL ARCHIVES >>

iDEA: Drexel E-repository and Archives > Drexel Academic Community > College of Engineering > Department of Civil, Architectural,and Environmental Engineering > Faculty Research and Publications (CAEE) > Limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1860/2562

Title: Limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures
Authors: Catbas, F.N.
Ciloglu, Suleyman Korhan
Hasancebi, O.
Grimmelsman, Kirk Alexander
Aktan, Ahmet Emin
Keywords: Bridges, Long-Span;Finite Element Method;Vibration;Load Tests;Monitoring
Issue Date: Aug-2007
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Citation: Journal of Structural Engineering
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to discuss the limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures. These limitations arise due to the geometric complexity, uncertain boundary and continuity conditions, loading environment, and the imperfect knowledge and errors in modeling such large constructed facilities. In this paper, the writers present their studies on developing a mixed microscopic-structural element level three-dimensional finite-element FE modeling of a long-span bridge structure and its structural system identification by integrating various experimental techniques. It is shown that a reasonable level of confidence 50–90% can be achieved with a model that is calibrated using global and local structural monitoring data with a sufficiently high spatial resolution. The reliability of the global attributes, such as boundary and continuity conditions that may be identified and simulated by means of field-calibrated models using only dynamic test results globally calibrated models , may appear to be high as much as 90% . However, the reliability that should be expected for local stress fields is shown to be an entirely different matter, and a calibration based on just dynamic testing would be unable to reveal the confidence in simulated local responses. This is especially true for long-span bridges, because the resolutions of the dynamic test grids are often quite sparse due to the large size of the structures. In this paper, the writers illustrate that the density, modality, and bandwidth of experimental data should be carefully evaluated and matched to the size and complexity of a constructed system before claiming that a FE model is validated. It is also shown that even more than three dozen acceleration measurement points, two dozen strain measurements, and a continuous surveillance of wind and temperature were barely sufficient for a credible structural identification of a long-span bridge.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1051)
http://hdl.handle.net/1860/2562
Appears in Collections:Faculty Research and Publications (CAEE)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2007005100.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in iDEA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! iDEA Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback